Posted by Jay (Montreal, Canada) on 21 December 2006 in Landscape & Rural.
Can it still be considered a "bridge" if there was no water under it? I think it's mainly supposed to be some sort of artwork, but people can walk over it, so who knows!
VFXY Photos | Cool Photoblogs | Listed on Photoblogs.org
PREVIEW ONLY
Add your comment ...
Canon PowerShot S3 IS1/25 secondF/5.68 mm
bridgeartwoodangles